Having observed many inefficient and extremely stupid methods of circulating materials in classrooms, lectures, and now my office, I think it’s high time someone came up with some rules to implement, like how we have rules for queuing up, standing on the left, etc. Circulation in this case refers to both materials that are plentiful, like lecture notes, and single items, like forms to be passed around and signed.
Why? Well, inevitably, there is always some idiot who passes the materials in the wrong direction or place, skipping a whole group of people entirely. Then the inefficiency of finding out who has not received the materials, and wasting time to redistribute, is really irritating.
If you think about it, it’s really easy to pass things around without really needing any rules. Just like it’s common sense to stand on the side of the escalator so others can walk pass. You could arrange yourself in any assortment you like on the escalator, as long as there was enough space for others to walk pass. And if everyone had enough sense, they’d all stand on the same side, be it left or right, so that it’s easier for those rushing to move straight through instead of weaving about.
But, as we all know, common sense isn’t common, and almost every other guy is a complete moron. Even with guidelines for standing on the left, there are constantly buffoons who stand on the right, and block people who want to walk up or down the escalator. But the rules definitely helped those who are not FUBAR-ly idiotic to do things the right way.
Similarly, in circulation of materials, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out how things should go. Just see where the item was passed from, and consider the potential directions it can go. If there’s more than one possible direction, you can easily check if it’s passed that way by asking. All those thoughts take less than a few seconds to process and execute, if you have any brains more than an ant.
The worse kind of pea-brains are those who accept things that have been passed their way once. Hello? If something is supposed to be distributed around, it should go only one way. If that very said item is supposed to be returned after distribution or passing around, the last person should directly return the item instead of passing it back around. All these pea-brains do is confusing the chain of distribution.
Therefore, my guidelines for circulation is pretty simple. In a system with only 2 rows or 2 columns, potentially forming a closed shape, pass things clockwise, and stop the moment it reaches you again. If you’re not the first person to receive it, but you’re the last, you’re allowed to barrage the person who passed it to you with expletives, and throw in a few punches and kicks for good measure. Not that it’ll help that idiot gain any IQ points.
In an orderly system of more that 2 rows or columns, like in a classroom or lecture, pass things in a snake or S structure. The item A will enter from one side, known as the tail, and will pass on down a row until it reaches the other end, and move to the second row, travelling in the opposite direction. When it reaches the end of the system, the endpoint, known as the head, is where the circulation terminates. This is somewhat similar to snake on Nokia handphones. A simple rule for the persons on extreme corners is always to check if the person behind or in front of you have received the item. Unless someone was being stupid, only one of them should not have the item passed to them yet. If you’re not at the extreme sides, passing is brainless exercise. Unfortunately, most people are brainless, and manage to fuck this up anyway.
This method will require the lecturer or teacher to use some of their massive brainjuices as well. Distribute from the extreme left or right of the first row, and not the middle of the row, for god’s sake. Your students are dumb enough, and don’t need you to confuse them. Walking a little bit won’t hurt. Traditionally, the laziness of teachers has been the main point of confusion. But the more promising students compensate for this lack of intelligence by counting and passing the exact number of copies to one side, and passing the remainder to the other side. Circulation can then resume the snake structure. The flaw with this correction is that it cannot be applied to circulations involving a single item.
Note that this method is also scalable to encompass multiple entry points, as long as the entry point is always from an extreme end, and not from the middle. As soon as the head of a snake meets the tail of another snake, the tail should immediately end the circulation. A modified version can be used if the head is absolutely barred from returning the item by simply walking down the aisle. In this case, the item should be passed directly forwards, along the extreme end, and should be in no way passed to anyone in the middle.
A common complication to this method is the presence of what I call asses. Meaning, other than being incurably stupid, they are also incurably stubborn and selfish. When something is meant to be passed around, it means you pass it around to others, even if you’re not interested in it. Not say no and continue ignoring the person to your side. The presense of an ass tends to significantly slow any circulation, and occasionally causing the head of the snake to double back in systems where the members are of low intelligence.
Again. Please liberally abuse any dim-witted fool who fucks the system up. It’s only fair that since they can subject us to the painful torture of their baseness, we are allowed to reciprocate.
Things get trickier in an unorderly system, like in function halls where everyone sits on the floor in random rows. For this, a more organic snake structure can be adopted, which requires a little enquiry and observation. I have not solved the problem of circulation in this system, so anyone with any ideas can propose it. The only reason why I have even bothered to think of this is for the unintelligent. Anyone of us possessing true IQ can circulate materials with little difficulty.
In the meantime, let us continue to wage a war on those human-like apes, who claim to have brains but fail to use it.
Footnote: The problem of circulation is indeed a real one, especially in macro systems involving large populations, like food distribution etc. However, I am not tackling that aspect of the problem. This is purely a micro and myopic rant.